by Kerry M. Bell P.E.
March 31, 2008

UL 199 incorporates a full range of performance tests for one reason — to ensure product reliability and durability.
Fire sprinklers have proven to be a highly
effective tool in reducing the loss of life and property from fires for more
than 125 years. The usage, as well as the end use applications of these
products, continues to expand and, according to the International Fire
Sprinkler Association, an estimated 100 million fire sprinklers were installed
worldwide in 2006. Because the application and installation environments are
expanding and changing, on-going performance assessments of these products in
the field are instrumental in maintaining a high level of
effectiveness.
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL) has been listing fire sprinklers since
1902. As a part of UL’s third-party certification program, qualification and
surveillance testing is conducted to evaluate the ability of sprinklers to
comply with specified criteria. In addition to this testing, UL closely
monitors the field experience and performance of sprinklers, and regularly
updates the standards to address new technology and information learned from
the use of these products in the field. In recent years, a number of revisions
have been introduced into UL’s sprinkler standards to enhance the operating
performance characteristics of both wet and dry-type sprinklers.
UL 199 and Other Sprinkler Standards
Currently, UL publishes three standards for sprinkler products described as
follows:
• UL199, Standard for Automatic Sprinklers for Fire-Protection Service
• UL1626, Standard for Residential Sprinklers for Fire-Protection
Service
• UL1767, Standard for Early-Suppression Fast-Response
Sprinklers
The products covered by these standards are intended to be installed in
accordance with the nationally recognized installation standards published by
the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).
UL’s fire sprinkler standards include nearly 40 different performance tests and
a limited number of prescriptive construction-type requirements. The
performance tests in UL’s sprinkler standards fall into five categories, as
indicated in Table 1. While all of these tests are important to provide a high
level of confidence that fire sprinklers will perform as intended, the focus of
this article is on the requirements that are intended to address the potential
adverse affects of exposure to anticipated environmental conditions.
Because fire sprinklers are a critical property protection and, in some cases,
a life-safety tool, the construction of these products consider both
reliability and durability. As a part of UL’s certification program, an extensive
series of corrosion resistance and environmental exposure tests described in
Table 2 on page 15 are conducted to investigate the ability of these products
to resist degradation when exposed to a wide range of field environments.
It is important to understand that many of these tests are accelerated under
controlled laboratory test conditions to simulate extended service time in the
field. To limit the duration of these tests to a reasonable time frame, the
techniques used to accelerate the corrosion, loading or degradation processes
include the use of aggressive atmospheric exposure conditions and high test
temperatures.
While all fire sprinklers are constructed to incorporate a significant level of
corrosion resistance, sprinklers identified as “corrosion resistant” are UL
Listed for use in corrosive external atmospheres. These sprinklers typically
utilize a wax or other coating to achieve this designation. Corrosion resistant
sprinklers are subjected to more challenging salt spray, hydrogen sulfide and
carbon dioxide-sulfur dioxide test conditions as described in Table 2.
One of the critical construction requirements recently introduced into UL’s fire sprinkler standards was a prohibition on the use of dynamic O-ring water seals. Based upon reports from property owners, sprinkler contractors, authorities having jurisdiction and others (which was supported by testing thousands of sprinkler samples from hundreds of installation sites across the country), UL concluded that sprinklers incorporating dynamic O-ring water seal assemblies might not operate as intended in a fire condition.
Table 2. Selected UL 199 Corrosion Resistance and Environmental Exposure Tests.
Kerry M. Bell P.E.
Kerry Bell, P.E., is a principal engineer at Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL), specializing in fire sprinkler and pump equipment. Since 1976, he has been involved in UL’s testing and certification activities related to a variety of fire suppression products, including fire sprinkler system equipment, portable fire extinguishers and special hazard extinguishing systems. Bell is a member of several technical committees of the NFPA, American Water Works Association and ASTM International. He is currently a member of NFPA’s Residential Sprinkler Systems, Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria and Technical Correlating Committees; chairman of the NFPA Technical Committee on Water Spray Fixed Systems, and vice chairman of UL’s Fire Council.
Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
Virtual encyclopedia on modern hydronic systems.
CONNECT WITH PM ENGINEER: