by Christine Swanson, PE, CFPS
October 1, 2011
Duct-type smoke detectors must install at a minimum length from the air handler and before any takeoffs. Photo courtesy of Honeywell Fire Systems, Americas.
Coordinating different fire protection disciplines is important.
Over the course of 21 years, I have been part of firms ranging from five
to 3,500 employees.
Communication and coordination practices have to evolve with the changing size
of the engineering firm or design team. However, regardless of the number of
minds involved, the basics remain the same.
Coordination between disciplines during the design phase of a building is
paramount to a better deliverable. At each phase of design, coordination meetings
between all disciplines should be included in the project schedule. During such
meetings, each discipline should have a chance to identify where its equipment
and major systems exist, as well as what features might affect other
disciplines.
Some examples of coordination topics include fire resistance-rated shafts,
smoke barriers and fire barriers. Highlight these items on the life safety drawings
and discuss with your team. Identify all shafts, voids and “utility” rooms for
use, as well as all utilities that are contained within, originate in or pass
through such areas.
I have surveyed facilities where an empty shaft remained after construction
with no access or penetrations on any floor, a two-hour fire resistance-rated enclosure
and absolutely nothing within it. Regular coordination meetings can avoid such
wastes of construction dollars, design time and space.
So where are stair-pressurization or
smoke-management systems required? The architect, mechanical engineer and fire
protection engineer should identify what types of penetration seal assemblies
should exist and where. What other envelopes or barriers need to exist? Where
do security layers exist? Have you implemented delayed-release door locks?
Discuss those delineations with your team and highlight them on the life safety
drawings.
Where are the air handlers located, how much airflow do they see, and where
will duct-type smoke detectors be required in relation to each air handler?
Show fire, fire and smoke, and smoke dampers on mechanical, electrical and fire
alarm drawings. Notes on the drawings may include the following:
Too often, a system design drawing says, “Installed by others,” and “Provided
by others.” This may be an expensive, overlooked line item — such as a duct
smoke detector — installed in several locations. As most duct-type smoke
detectors are proprietary with respect to the installed fire alarm system, the
fire alarm contractor should provide such devices.
Further, the fire alarm contractor needs to verify the duct-type smoke detector
and its sampling tube is sized according to the duct cross-section at each discrete
installation location. The fire alarm contractor shall locate where the duct
detectors physically go in the duct, and the mechanical contractor shall cut
the duct for the detector tube penetrations.
In an ideal situation, duct-type smoke detectors are all addressable. Upon
smoke detection in any of the ducts within the air-handling system, the fire
alarm panel sends a shutdown signal to a control module at the air handler.
Duct-type smoke detectors must install at a minimum length from the air handler
and before any takeoffs. For example,
install a duct detector at a distance equal to six times the larger
cross-sectional dimension of the duct from the air handler.
Duct-type smoke detectors may sometimes register a false detection due to a
puff of steam or dust in the air duct. When a smoke detector has air pass
through it containing steam, dust or other particles that obscure the light
source within the detector, the detector registers this to the fire alarm
panel. Depending on how the fire alarm panel is programmed to handle this
detection, an immediate alarm condition may occur, the detector may be
registered as dirty under a supervisory condition at the panel or the panel may
start a delay countdown and then check the detector status again.
Many times the obscuration clears during the delay, as it is only a temporary
change in the air quality and not due to smoke from fire. This is common with
the presence of steam humidification systems or in HVAC systems where there may
be an instantaneous puff of fog in the duct due to conditioning systems
cycling. False detections minimize if the duct detector is programmed with the
fire alarm panel to have a delay and recheck of the detector status.
You cannot foresee all functional system issues. Coordination of building
systems design will not prevent all problems, but it will minimize the level of
last-minute changes during construction.
Christine Swanson, PE, CFPS
Christine Swanson, PE, FPE, CFPS, is a registered Professional Engineer in Fire Protection Engineering. She has been working in the industry of life safety and consumer product safety since 1990, with firms including Caterpillar, Underwriters Laboratories, Lockheed Martin, Federal Aviation Administration, Gage Babcock and Associates, Fire Safety Solutions, Clark Nexsen, and currently Hankins and Anderson Architects and Engineers. She can be reached at c.swanson@ha-inc.com or 757-213-6059.
Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
Virtual encyclopedia on modern hydronic systems.
CONNECT WITH PM ENGINEER: