Green Plumbing & Mechanical Design
Addition By Subtraction
by Mike Miazga
August 1, 2010
Enlarge this
picture
Waterless urinals will help reduce sanitary sewer flows and
water demand by 20% on game days.
The use of waterless urinals is one of the key water-saving initiatives at New Meadowlands Stadium in New Jersey.
New Meadowlands Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J., is the latest of the
modern, high-tech, amenity-rich sports stadiums to debut in the United
States.
Thus, it is only fitting the new home of the National Football League’s New
York Giants and New York Jets features a progressive technology that will help
reduce water consumption in the 82,500-seat structure that shares the
Meadowlands Sports Complex with the Izod Center arena and Meadowlands Racetrack.
Taking 36 months to construct, New Meadowlands Stadium is the first new
facility in the NFL to utilize waterless urinals throughout its male restrooms.
Approximately 600 Kohler Steward (model K-4918) waterless urinals are installed
in the facility, which was constructed next door to the old Giants Stadium
(which has since been razed).
“The teams’ philosophy and goal of being good stewards of the environment led
us to seek innovative means to conserve water and reduce energy consumption,”
notes Craig Schmitt, project manager for Philadelphia-based Ewing Cole, the stadium’s
architect and mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineers.
“Specifying waterless urinals, which is a relatively new technology, was a
logical choice given the number of plumbing fixtures in the
stadium.”
The only other NFL stadium Ewing Cole is aware of that uses waterless urinals
is Sun Life Stadium in Miami, though Schmitt says that was a partial retrofit
project. At the college level, Schmitt mentions Arizona Stadium (University of
Arizona), the Rose Bowl (USC) and Scheumann Stadium (Ball State) as facilities
that have retrofitted waterless urinals into their
restrooms.
Schmitt says the use of waterless urinals and other water-saving fixtures is
projected to save 2.7 million gallons of water and reduce sanitary sewer flows
and water demand by 20% to 25% on game days.
While the new stadium has a low occupancy calendar compared to indoor arenas
and baseball stadiums, the massive seating capacity fueled the choice to go
with waterless urinals.
“You see the use of waterless urinals in high-occupancy facilities,” Schmitt
says. “This stadium is used mainly for football and concerts. It really isn’t
used as often as places like airport restrooms and rest stops off the turnpike.
The teams still felt the building was big enough and had enough plumbing
fixtures to where the waterless urinals would help conserve water.”
Pipe Dream

Waterless urinals will also vastly reduce maintenance
issues.
With no water used to irrigate the urinals, water-service piping was
eliminated from the installation equation.
“There is no (water-) service piping required so (the waterless urinals) also
reduce the amount of construction material and construction waste during
installation compared to a conventional urinal,” Schmitt explains.
Instead, PVC drainage piping (by J-M Eagle and Charlotte Pipe) was installed
specifically to combat salts found in urine.“PVC was selected because there had
been published instances of urine salts forming blockages in metallic piping
systems,” Schmitt notes. “The urine salts were thought to form blockages due to
there not being any additional water flow to dilute or carry the salts along
the drainage system.”
Ewing Cole Senior Plumbing Engineer
Bruce Falkenstein, P.E.,
adds that when a piping system has no flushing flow of water, there is no
velocity in the piping to push anything that would settle out of the flow
stream. Thus, the product that settles out of a urine waste stream will
crystalize, which will cause a buildup over time.
“We specified PVC piping because it is smoother and does not corrode like
metallic pipes,” says Falkenstein, the lead plumbing engineer on the stadium project.
“The salts will have a better chance of moving down the pipeline. With cast
iron, there will be some minor corrosion over time that will reduce the smoothness
of the pipe and will lead to more buildup of salts.”
Fewer Maintenance Headaches
Enlarge this
picture
Approximately 600 Kohler Steward (model K-4918)
waterless urinals are installed in the stadium.
Besides taking a major bite out of water consumption, waterless urinals
also bring relief by lowering maintenance costs.
“As all building systems get older, they require more care,” says
Pradeep
Patel, a project principle for Ewing Cole who was involved in the
construction of the original Giants Stadium as well as both Veterans Stadium
(former home of the Eagles and the Phillies) and Citizens Bank Park (current
home of Phillies) in Philadelphia. “The waterless urinals are less of a
maintenance issue.”
Schmitt adds: “You hear complaints about having to fix broken flush valves.
With these, there is no flushing, period. You’ve got 600 urinals that will
never see a broken flush valve. That’s significant.”
The absence of a flush valve provides added hygiene for users and eliminates
any concern about vandalism to handles, he notes.
In terms of actual maintenance, the waterless urinals installed at the stadium
utilize a liquid trap seal, as opposed to a cartridge.
“The manufacturer recommends that about every two weeks the urinal be flushed
out and the liquid seal (approximately 3 ounces) be replaced,” Schmitt says.
“Routine cleaning after events is done by the use of a spray cleaner and manual
wiping.”
The sealing liquid, Schmitt explains, is less dense than liquid waste. Thus,
the urine flows by gravity under the liquid seal. The urinal trap-way is
designed to slow the liquid waste so the liquid seal does not wash away and,
instead, can trap odors.
More Water Savings
In addition to waterless urinals, New
Meadowlands Stadium is filled with other water-conserving components that
Schmitt says will further contribute to the savings of an estimated 11 million
gallons of water on a yearly basis. Giants Stadium used an average of 41
million gallons of water per year, while the new stadium is hoping to use 30
million gallons.
Low-flow toilets (1.6 gpf) and showerheads (2.5 gpm) are installed in the
stadium, as are sensors and meters on all faucets. Battery-powered lav faucets
(with 0.5 gpm flow restrictors) are also used.
The stadium’s artificial turf field eliminates the need for playing surface
irrigation throughout the year.
“We estimate the water savings to be approximately 3.5 million gallons annually
by not having to use water to maintain a natural grass field,” Schmitt says.
The use of native plants, granite fines in the parking islands (in lieu of
non-porous paving) and a high-efficiency irrigation system are also critical in
the stadium’s water-conservation plan. The high-efficiency irrigation system
has a 95% efficiency rate and is predicted to save 700,000 gallons of water per
year.
“High-efficiency irrigation systems deliver water directly to the soil and
plantings, minimizing overspray, overwatering and water loss due to evaporation
and wind,” Schmitt points out.
A Green Partnership
Enlarge this
picture
The stadium is the first new NFL facility to utilize
waterless urinals throughout its restrooms.
The stadium is not pursuing any U.S. Green Building Council Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification, but Schmitt notes the
football teams have partnered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to
jointly commit to responsible stewardship of the environment through execution
of a memorandum of understanding. The goals of the agreement with EPA stand to
save the equivalent of the emissions of nearly 1.68 million metric tons of
carbon dioxide during the stadium’s construction and its first year of
operation (equal to taking more than 300,000 cars off the road for a
year).
Despite being twice as large as its predecessor, the new stadium is predicted
to use about 30% less energy per square foot (4.64 watts per square foot)
thanks to partnering with EPA’s ENERGY STAR program.
“Ownership has been a prime mover in conserving energy and natural resources,”
Patel says. “They really drove that home from Day 1.”
And waterless urinals are a key part of the stadium’s green playbook.
Peaks and Valleys
While New Meadowlands Stadium is loaded with
water-conserving fixtures, the plumbing road during construction was bumpy at
times.
Yet new technology helped to
considerably ease the construction ride.
The project’s early goal was to
establish an underground drainage package. However, Ewing Cole, the architect
and MEP engineers on the stadium project, had to overcome numerous obstacles,
including the upper levels of the stadium not being finalized, the stadium
sitting on a landfill site with poor soil and the grade level being only
several feet above the water table (the field sits 7 feet above sea level).
This meant the entire structure had to
be pile-supported and the ground floor (set at grade) had to be a 12-inch
thick, structurally reinforced concrete slab supported on radial and transverse
grade beams.
“The drainage piping had to be
carefully planned to avoid the stadium foundations while remaining relatively
close to the surface,” Ewing Cole Project Manager Craig Schmitt explains. “All underground drainage piping had to be
hung from the slab.”
The design-build process enabled the
fast-track development of the underground drainage package just two months
after the signing of the design-build agreement.
Schmitt notes the innovative use of
global positioning satellite (GPS) technology helped pinpoint the stub-up
locations within the stadium’s radial structural bays, which helped avoid
costly mistakes for the large number of drainage stub-ups within the slab.
The design-engineering teams also had to
tackle the challenge of the drainage system underneath the field. The
combination of the soil condition, the high water table and the heavy loads on
the field (football, soccer, concerts, tractor pulls, monster truck shows)
required the playing field to be designed as a pile-supported structural slab
with a 12-inch thick combination of stone, sand and drainage mat between the
slab and the finished playing turf.
“Essentially, the slab under the field
is like a giant bathtub,” Schmitt says.
Draining storm water off the playing
field area was tricky because of insufficient depth to locate drainage piping
between the slab and the playing surface, Schmitt notes. In order to drain the
field, roof-type drains were specified under the turf (located continuously
along the sidelines) to collect water that filtered through the playing
surface.
The gravel sub-base layer acts as a
reservoir and provides the necessary head pressure to maintain drainage flow.
Continuous trench drains set above the playing field slab are utilized along
the sidelines to collect surface runoff from the synthetic turf.
Mapping The Future
The project’s design aspect was aided by the use of building
information modeling (BIM). Skanska USA,
Ewing Cole’s design-build partner, utilized BIM as a means of coordinating the
MEP systems and for clash detection.
“They required that most — not all — of
their MEP subcontractors do their shop drawings with BIM and then held weekly
coordination meetings with all parties to review the BIM model, room by room,
to ensure coordination,” explains Schmitt. “In some cases, Skanska actually
trained the subcontractors who had never used the software before.”
Skanska used Autocad MEP, QuickPen and
CAD-Mech software to design the sanitary piping, water-supply piping, gas
piping and mechanical piping. Navisworks Manage software was used for clash
detection.
The use of BIM technology for the
stadium project revealed coordination issues among trades, space limitations
and system collisions that may have been missed in a typical 2D shop drawing
coordination effort.
The BIM software used on the stadium
project produced intricate detailing for materials like insulation on piping,
hanger sizes and lengths, coupler sizes, drain bodies and piping wall sizes.
“The applications used are capable of
detailing to a high level of accuracy. The steel model generated in Tekla was
accurate to about 1/16 of an inch to what was installed in the field. Skanska’s
requirements for the project were that if a subcontractor did not detail an
element, no matter the size, and a clash was found in the field, the
subcontractor would be responsible for any cost impact generated.”
Schmitt notes that it would be difficult
to put a dollar figure on the amount of time and money saved through the use of
BIM technology on the stadium project. But other major benefits were realized.
“There is a considerable expense
upfront creating the 3D model,” he says. “However, this is at least partially
offset by more efficient installation due to better coordination of trades and,
of course, savings of time and money from the prevention of clashes before
installation. Also, another significant benefit is that material calculations
can be generated from the 3D models, and thus many elements can be prefabricated
and do not need to be field cut.”
Mike Miazga
miazgam@bnpmedia.com
Mike Miazga is the senior editor of pme. He can be reached at 847/405-4056.
Links
Contact PM Engineer >> Send
pme your feedback by visiting our Contact Us page. View staff e-mail and mailing addresses, or send us a Letter To The Editor.
Follow pme on Twitter! >> Follow
pme’s news
feed daily on Twitter where we're tweeting industry-specific links and
information @PMEngineer.
Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
CONNECT WITH PM ENGINEER: