Guest Commentary: The I-Codes and Green Building
by Fred Grable P.E.
Jay Peters
July 1, 2008
Sustainability requires a careful consideration of all factors associated with the construction, use and eventual demolition of a building.
 |
| Jay Peters |
|
In
early 2007, The International Code Council (ICC) released a policy position
statement supporting green building, reflecting its commitment to social
responsibility and expanding the boundaries of public safety. In that
statement, the Code Council vowed to (1) educate its members about programs for
achieving environmentally responsible buildings, (2) participate in activities
with other organizations to assure green building practices are safe and
sustainable, and (3) advocate for green building in the legislative, regulatory
and codes arenas.
Concurrent with the release of the policy position statement, the Code Council
moved its headquarters into a LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design) certified building in Washington, D.C., and soon thereafter created
Sustainable Workplace Advocate Teams in each of its three regional offices.
ICC’s activities were particularly visible at that time — and continue to be —
but its commitment to sustainability is longstanding.
 |
| Fred Grable, P.E. |
|
The
Code Council was involved with green initiatives and sustainability long before
it was a gleam in many other organizations’ eyes. ICC’s International
Energy Conservation Code (IECC) — the most widely adopted energy code
in the world — in effect, marked the beginning of the green movement in the
code arena. Subsequently, the Code Council developed the International
Plumbing Code (IPC), the most widely adopted sustainable-minded
plumbing code in the nation.
For years, the IPC has incorporated innovative technologies like waterless
urinals and detailed engineered designs permitting the installation of smaller,
more precise water and drainage systems — resulting in the savings of millions
of gallons of water, not to mention countless miles of conduit
materials.
ICC also works internationally with the World Plumbing Council (WPC), the World
Toilet Organization (WTO) and, most recently, the Sustainable Sanitation
Alliance (SSA). This de facto coalition of industries has brought its Plumbing,
Mechanical and Fuel Gas (PMG) staff to Zurich and Tokyo and, later this year,
to South Africa, Canada and Macau. It is also developing global guidelines in
conjunction with the WTO for safe sanitation and clean water, an initiative
that will reduce disease and help millions of people worldwide.
The “Green Book”
|
|
| International Plumbing Code Adoption Map |
|
Many
professionals who use ICC’s Family of International Codes
casually refer to the IPC as the “green book.” Little did anyone realize that
the color of the International Plumbing Code’s cover would also come to
symbolize the environmental sustainability movement.
It would be a flattering testament to ICC’s prescience if by the color
selection of the IPC’s cover the Code Council had knowingly anticipated the
global movement green would soon come to represent. Although no such credit can
be taken, it can be said that the IPC’s contributors were thinking and acting
in ways that guided its emergence as the code leader for sustainable plumbing
installation.
Green building practices involve more than just selecting environmentally safe
or recyclable materials. The designer must also see the bigger picture, often
called the “cradle to grave” view. For example, he or she might choose cast
iron drain, waste and vent piping because of the material’s recyclability.
While this avoids the use of nonrenewable petroleum resources for the
production of plastic pipe, it may not be the most sustainable option. The
broader perspective would consider other issues, including:
How much energy does it take to manufacture the cast iron pipe and
transport it to the jobsite?
How much energy will it later take to remove the piping from the
building and transport the iron to the nearest steel recycling
facility?
How much energy will it take to melt down the recycled
material?
Depending on the answers to these questions, plastic drainage piping might be a
better choice because petroleum resources and plastic pipe manufacturing plants
might be closer to the jobsite, its manufacture consumes a relatively low
amount of energy, it weighs substantially less and, thus, requires less energy
to transport, and it can be recycled using low-energy
methods.
This example is not intended to promote plastic over cast iron piping, only to
serve as an illustration of the important green implications a designer should
consider. If cast iron pipe is manufactured relatively near the jobsite or
plastic pipe is not readily available in the region, iron may well be the best
choice.
Another factor that might influence the choice of cast iron over plastic would
be the extra energy and special fill materials needed to properly install
plastic piping underground in poor soil conditions. The point is that
sustainability requires a careful consideration of all factors associated with
the construction, use and eventual demolition of a
building.
While the choice of materials used in plumbing systems today plays a part in
green building practices, the most significant impact is achieved through
efficiency: using less material. The IPC has always focused on methods to
safeguard public health and safety using the least amount of materials
possible. The following characteristics illustrate how the IPC supports sustainable
plumbing installations.
Compared to other plumbing codes, the dimensions of drain, waste and
vent pipe are generally smaller for the same number and type of
fixtures.
Thanks to the wide selection of venting options, less piping is needed
to accomplish the same task.
Vent terminals can terminate through outside walls versus through
the roof, thereby reducing vent-piping length.
Air admittance valve venting options can significantly reduce the
length of vent piping to outdoor terminals.
Combination drain-and-vent systems can use smaller drain-pipe sizing
than under other codes and may eliminate the need for multiple vent
pipes.
Circuit venting methods within the IPC eliminate redundant vent
piping.
Waste stack venting, a material-efficient method for the
installation of vertical drainage pipe systems, is another permissible
option.
Some approved engineered vent system designs allow reduced vent
system pipe sizes.
Water pipe sizing generally is smaller for the same number and types
of fixtures.
Manifold water distribution systems can be used, resulting in
smaller water pipe sizes and significant water and energy savings.
Waterless urinals can achieve enormous water savings and do not
require “backup” water supply, greatly reducing the amount of pipe
used.
An often-asked question is: “Does the IPC promote water
conservation?” The answer is, Yes. As required by the Energy Policy Act of
1992, the IPC mandates limits on maximum flow rates and consumption for certain
plumbing fixtures. Waterless urinal technology is also included by the IPC in
its 2006 edition. The code also contains an appendix for gray water systems
design, should a jurisdiction choose to allow this technology.
There is a high probability that the 2009 edition of the IPC will incorporate
additional sustainable methods; a single stack venting method and a siphonic
roof drain method have been proposed and committee-approved, and are currently
awaiting a final assembly vote. Whatever ICC’s membership decides, the IPC
truly is and will remain a “green code,” not because of its cover but due to
its progressive sustainable methods for plumbing installations and its long
track record of allowing specially designed systems that assure a miminum level
of safety, and, at the same time, a maximum level of efficiency
The National Green Building Standard
Even
prior to the release of ICC’s green building policy position statement, the
Code Council was involved in various green building-related projects. For
example, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and ICC were joint
stakeholders in the creation of NAHB’s Model Green Home Building
Guidelines, which were released in 2005. In addition, ICC’s
award-winning magazine, Building Safety Journal, and its
electronic periodicals regularly include articles and news items on various
aspects of the subject, and its regularly updated Green Building Webpage, www.ICCsafe.org/green,
provides a wealth of resources.
Most recently, ICC partnered with NAHB in producing the (now-titled) ICC
700-2008 National Green Building Standard (NGBS) — which is
widely seen as ICC’s most ambitious green effort to date. The initial draft of
the standard was based on NAHB’s aforementioned Model Green Home
Building Guidelines, and the NGBS will be the first residential green
building standard created under American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
protocol, with the NAHB Research Center administering the process in their
capacity as Secretariat. Draft Standard No. 2 of the NGBS has been approved by
the NGBS Consensus Committee and has been submitted to ANSI for approval.
The NGBS is intended to rate the environmental impact of residential
structures, including new construction, renovations and additions. It can be
administered by any adopting entity, such as a governmental jurisdiction, green
building program, or any other adopting third-party compliance-assurance body.
The standard addresses environmental concerns through consideration of the
following general criteria.
Land Conservation. Example: Section 501.1
encourages the development of infill lots (lots in existing developments which
were never built upon). Developing infill lots does not require the development
of new infrastructure, such as roadways, public water supply, storm sewers and
electric and gas utilities.
Material Resource Conservation. Example: Section
601.1 encourages the construction of smaller dwellings. Small dwellings use far
less material resources than large dwellings of similar construction
types.
Energy Conservation. Example: If energy analysis
software is used in accordance with Section 702.2, Bronze Performance is
attained (in the energy category only) if energy efficiency is 15% above
baseline requirements of the 2006 IECC; Silver, if 30% above; Gold, if 50% above;
Emerald, if 60% above.
Water Conservation. Example: Section 801.1
encourages reduction in hot water use by numerous prescriptive means. More
energy is used to heat hot water than for any other purpose on the
planet.
Indoor Air Quality. Example: If a fireplace (or
natural draft fuel burning appliance) is provided, Section 901.2.1 requires
that it be vented to the outdoors and have adequate combustion and ventilation
air. Various prescriptive requirements and standards are referenced. Fireplaces
can be a major source of indoor air pollution in dwelling units if they are not
installed properly.
Owner Education Regarding the Maintenance and Operation of
Green Buildings. Example: Section 101.1 requires that a homeowner's
binder be provided, and lists required and optional information. If a green
building is to remain green throughout its life cycle, proper maintenance and
operation are crucial.
An Active Commitment
As
with its partnership with NAHB in the production of the NGBS, ICC works with
many organizations that are leaders in the green and sustainable building
movement. A Code Council staff member serves as consultant to the Consensus
Committee in the ANSI process, which is being utilized to create ASHRAE/USGBC/IESNA
189.1, Standard for High-Performance Green Buildings Except Low-Rise
Residential Buildings.
Also, ICC Evaluation Service is a voting member of the Consensus Committee in
the ANSI process that is being used to create the Green Building Initiative’s
Green Globes v.1 Post-Construction Assessment green building standard for
commercial buildings. The Code Council also advocates for green building on
Capitol Hill (as well as directly to state and local jurisdictions), has added
many new green publications to the ICC bookstore, and attends and exhibits at
green building conferences, expos and educational events.
For those in the know, none of this will come as a surprise. The IECC has been
accepted by many jurisdictions as the flagship for energy saving installations
and is now the most widely adopted energy code in the world, and the Code
Council’s building and residential codes have always promoted building
durability and safeguarded public health and welfare right along with public safety.
In fact, the International Codes could well be viewed as the foundation on
which the majority of modern green and sustainable programs and standards are
based. After all, without regularly maintained, fair and enforceable codes like
those produced by ICC, there would be no firm framework on which to hang the
fruit of a safe and healthy built environment for the generations to
come.
Industry-leading organizations like ICC move at such a fast pace that, by the
time they toot their horn, they have often already passed the next mile marker
and no one hears them. Nonetheless, the Code Council will continue to move at
light speed and hope that people will notice us as we zoom by. If they don’t,
we'll be back around again on the next lap to pick them up!
|