Cover Story
Savings boost
by Dan Prangsgaard
January 1, 2012

Evco Mechanical President Evan Samouhos at Parkview
Towers in West New York, N.J.
Photo by Doug Goodman
Advanced pumping system dramatically lowers New Jersey building’s
energy costs.
Evan Samouhos was so confident in the
potential energy savings offered by a new domestic water booster pump system
that he fronted the purchase himself.
“We had absolutely no doubt that we could slash half of the operating costs of
a commercial domestic water-boosting application by using intelligent,
demand-based pump technology,” recalls Samouhos, president of West Orange,
N.J.-based Evco Mechanical, and a
32-year plumbing industry veteran.
“The problem, however, was convincing a price-conscious customer to invest in
new technology instead of rebuilding the decades-old pressure-boosting pumps
and motor drives.”
The application supported the domestic water delivery system for half of the
Parkview Towers, a 684-unit affordable housing complex in West New York, N.J.
Built in 1974 and located blocks from the Hudson River, the pumping station
delivers domestic water to one of the twin 24-story apartment building towers.
“In recent years, variable-frequency drive technology has become more affordable
and critical in bringing intelligent speed control to a number of commercial
pumping applications, including domestic water boosting,” explains Peter Frangiskou,
P.E., vice president of Dolphin Equipment Corp., an independent manufacturers agent
based in Haworth, N.J. “The ability to scale output based on demand was the
primary reason we knew we could significantly reduce energy consumption for
this building.”
Convincing the end-user was not as clear-cut, however.
“We were initially skeptical of the recommendation to completely replace the
system because it was still viable,” property manager Blanca Alvarez
recalls. “It’s hard to justify capital investments, especially in this economy,
for equipment that is operating as designed.”
Samouhos, who enjoys a long-working relationship with building management,
personally guaranteed a significant energy savings with the new system, a
Grundfos BoosterpaQ Pressure Boosting Station.
“I told the building owner, if the new boosters didn’t reduce energy
consumption by 40% to 50%, they didn’t have to pay me a dime,” says Samouhos,
who concedes he had achieved similar head-turning results since he began using
the preconfigured boosting stations in 2007.
In the end, an independent project audit vindicated the daring claim by
documenting a 90% energy savings over a one-week period in September 2010 and a
26-month payback period. The audit not
only justified Samouhos’ recommendation, but helped cement a valuable business
relationship between himself and Parkview
Towers management.
Control the flow
Enlarge this
picture
The
energy savings from the first tower were so significant, property managers
decided to upgrade the second tower’s original pressure-boosting pumps. Photos
by Doug Goodman
Demand for water in multistory buildings, such as Parkview Towers,
can vary significantly throughout the day. This unpredictable flow places
extraordinary demands on pumping equipment. High-rise buildings – including
hotel, multifamily, office and other institutional applications – require
pressure-boosting equipment to raise incoming municipal water pressure to serve
the top floors.
Samouhos recommended replacing the single building’s existing water
pressure-boosting system to overcome two system shortcomings: the frequent malfunction of mechanical
pressure-regulating valves that were prone to clogging and the inability to
match pump/motor output with flow demand.
He turned to Dolphin Equipment to help identify an option that would
efficiently meet system demand.
“We wanted an affordable, high-performance packaged replacement that could
deliver up to 200 psi, while still being compact in size,” explains
Andrew Cirillo, Dolphin’s sales engineer.
“While several boosting stations offer energy efficiencies and sophisticated
controllers, only this multi-stage pump system was capable of meeting our
pressure rating requirements right out of the box, with no additional
components to buy.”
While pressure-regulating valves are widely used to control discharge pressure
to a water distribution system, such as Parkview Towers,
they also are susceptible to debris buildup and require periodic adjustment and
maintenance. Moreover, fixed-speed pumps operating with pressure-regulating
valves run at full speed when flow requirements are low, a condition that can
cause pump wear, seal damage and wasted energy.
The water delivery system surrounding Parkview Towers was frequently marred by
mineral and scale deposits, possibly shaken loose with the opening of a fire
main or other large system shocks. This debris would decrease the efficiency of
the valves and result in large pressure fluctuations that could damage plumbing
fixture fittings, including water closets, faucets, relief valves, shock
absorbers and expansion joints, as well as result in plumbing pipe leaks.
Enlarge this
picture
(from left): Dolphin Equipment Vice
President Peter Frangiskou, P.E., Dolphin Equipment Sales Engineer Andrew
Cirillo and Evco Mechanical President Evan Samouhos.
Beyond the clogging and frequent loss of pressure control, the existing
water distribution system provided a constant output and continual energy
consumption, regardless of demand. Even
during low water usage times, such as overnight periods, the practice was to
continuously operate the pumps. That not only wastes electricity, but it also
decreases the life expectancy of the equipment.
Matching output with
demand
Based on these two performance concerns, Samouhos installed the
Grundfos integrated pressure-boosting system that offers up to six vertical
multistage CR pumps in parallel operation, designed to optimize pumping
efficiency over a range of flow rates. Ideal for water supply systems as well
as industrial and irrigation applications, the system utilizes an advanced
controller that along with variable-frequency drive-controlled motors, adjusts
pump speed and the number of pumps in operation to meet frequently changing
system demand.
Instead of using constant-speed pumps regulated by maintenance-prone pressure-
reducing valves, the new system delivers the minimal pump output necessary to
achieve optimal performance — all without direct human intervention.
“Rather than running flat-out, at top horsepower and bleeding off excess
pressure to reach the desired output, the more energy-efficient option is to
design a system that starts from zero and ramps up to meet the specific
demand,” Cirillo explains. “Since demand is not a constant, why not vary output?”
Proof in numbers

Samouhos
was so confident in the potential energy savings offered by the new domestic
water booster pump system that he fronted the purchase himself.
The tower’s original pressure-boosting system utilized three
constant-speed pumps: two 40-horespower pumps and a 20-horsepower backup pump.
With no pump sequencing software in place, the two primary 40-horsepower pumps
operated continuously unless alternated manually by the building engineer
during periods of low demand. The new boosting station leveraged two
15-horsepower pumps with variable-frequency drive-controlled motors. A single
15-horsepower pump handles the tower’s full pressure load. But if demand
exceeds this capacity, the second pump will provide additional pressure. In
addition to matching pump output to flow demand, the new duplex boosting
station yields significant energy savings.
“In calculating the flow rate requirements for the building, we determined that
we could not only eliminate an entire pump, but also downsize the remaining two
– from 100 total horsepower to 30 horsepower, without sacrificing performance,”
Samouhos reports. “Despite removing 70 horsepower from this system, the
computerized control, demand-based performance of the new pumping station
averages just 30% capacity.”
Nonetheless, upon seeing the reduced specifications, building management
doubted the system could perform as designed.
“Building engineers were concerned the system was undersized and would not
deliver adequate pressure to the upper floors,” Alvarez recalls. “Saving energy
was important, but system performance was paramount.”
To illustrate the savings of moving from a constant-speed pump to a variable,
demand-based platform, Dolphin Equipment commissioned an energy audit of both
apartment towers. The audit compared the power used by the duplex boosting
station against the conventional triplex system installed in the companion
building.
“We thought, ‘Where else will you come across two identical-use buildings – one
with energy-efficient technology and the other without?’” Frangiskou says.
“This was the perfect application to showcase the operating and energy efficiencies
of demand-based technology.”
The audit, paid for by Grundfos and Dolphin Equipment, bore out Samouhos’
original intuition and helped to justify his replacement vs. repair recommendation.
“We monitored the three-phase electrical consumption of the
pressure-boosting equipment in both apartment towers over a one-week period to
account for changes in load demands,” states
Tony
Sinacore, an applications engineer with Ramsey, N.J.-based
energy audit firm SDM Metro.
“Our team recorded a 92% drop in power
consumption in the building that was fitted with the energy-efficient boosting
station over the conventional system installed in the building’s other
tower.”
Sinacore notes the energy used during this one-week period would yield 121,067
kilowatt-hours annually, or an annual utility cost reduction of nearly $18,160,
based on an average area utility rate of $0.15 per kilowatt-hour (see chart
above).
Sinacore estimates the total project savings over a 15-year average pump
lifespan at just under $275,000. The level of savings, in fact, was so dramatic
that similar variable-speed drives were installed in the companion tower to
begin matching pump output with demand.
According to Grundfos, power consumption accounts for 85% of all costs incurred
during the life cycle of a pump. The
initial pump purchase price and the cost of regular maintenance account for the
remainder. Therefore, even the smallest
improvement in energy efficiency can translate to sizeable savings. In addition, system designers can squeeze an
additional 10% to 35% in energy savings by transitioning from pumps that use
pressure- reducing valves to those that leverage variable-speed drives,
depending on the system parameters.
“Building management was stunned that we could deliver the same level of
performance using just one-third the pumping horsepower of the old system,”
Samouhos says. “Every day the engineers would come in to see if the system was
collapsing under the crushing demand, only to find the booster station barely
breaking a sweat.”
Dan Prangsgaard
Dan Prangsgaard is director
of public affairs and public relations for Grundfos Pumps Corp. He may be
reached at dprangsgaard@grundfos.com.
Links
Contact PM Engineer >> Send
pme your feedback by visiting our Contact Us page. View staff e-mail and mailing addresses, or send us a Letter To The Editor.
Follow pme on Twitter! >> Follow
pme’s news
feed daily on Twitter where we're tweeting industry-specific links and
information @PMEngineer.
Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
CONNECT WITH PM ENGINEER: