Panel Radiator vs. Radiant Panel
by John Siegenthaler , P.E.
November 1, 2008
 |
| Figure 1. |
|
The difference is more than a play on words.
For years I’ve described radiant panel heating
in North America as “the tail wagging the hydronics dog.” During the last 25
years, radiant panel heating was largely responsible for leading the North
American hydronics market out of the doldrums of the 1970s to 25+% per year
market growth at the close of the 1990s. Many hydronic heating pros that got
into the market during this time cut their teeth designing and installing
radiant panel heating systems.
Given this coalescence of interest in radiant panel heating, one might wonder
if there’s any future for other types of hydronic heat emitters. I firmly
believe the answer is yes! This month we’ll look at one alternative that I
think is one of the most “underutilized” heat emitter options in the North
American market – the panel radiator.
The goal of this article is not to convince you to “switch” from radiant panels
to panel radiators, but rather to expand your awareness of the possibilities of
designing with panel radiators and compare their attributes to the current
standard bearer of heat emitters – radiant floor heating.
What is a Panel Radiator?
 |
| Figure 2. |
|
That’s a common response when the term “panel
radiator” is mentioned to a client as a possible heat emitter option for their
project. At present, panel radiators are not well known outside of the hydronic
trade in North America. This is in sharp contrast to a relatively high consumer
awareness of radiant floor heating.
All panel radiators release a combination of radiant and convective heat into a
room as hot water flows through them. Beyond this fundamental function is a
virtually unlimited range of forms, sizes, colors, and artistic
themes.
Let’s start with a basic “utility grade” panel radiator, such as shown
(installed) in Figure 1, and as a cutaway in Figure
2.
The front of the panel radiator is called the “water plate.” It consists of two
formed steel sheets welded together at their perimeter and across the face. The
upper and lower portions of the water plate act as headers. Several vertical
flow channels run between these headers.
 |
| Figure 3. |
|
A sheet of thin folded steel is welded to the
back of the water plate to create fins that enhance convective heat transfer.
The water plate and fin assembly are then framed with side and top trim
panels.
Many panel radiators of this type have supply and return piping connections at
the bottom, and a preinstalled flow control valve in the upper right corner (as
seen in Figures 1 and 2). Water flows into the bottom left connection, up a
riser and through the flow control valve, and then out across the water plate.
After flowing downward through the water channels, flow exits through the
bottom right connection.
The internal volume of the water plate is very low relative to a typical
cast-iron radiator of similar frontal area. For example: A 24-inch-high by
48-inch-wide panel radiator with a single water plate only holds about 0.7
gallons of water. The empty weight of this panel is about 75 pounds.
These characteristics produce a heat emitter with very low thermal mass
relative to its heat output capability. This allows for fast response, both
warming up and cooling off. A panel radiator can quickly begin radiating heat
to a cool space and quickly stop releasing heat should internal gains
occur.
This is in marked contrast to the response characteristics of many radiant floor
panels, especially those with tubing embedded in poured slabs. These
slow-response characteristics often rule out radiant floor heating in
situations where loads change rapidly due to internal heat
gain.
To increase heat output without changing face dimensions, manufacturers join
two or sometimes three water plate/fin assemblies together into a single
assembly as shown in Figure 3.
Panel radiators with two or three water plates have a higher percentage of
convective heat output than do single water plate panels operated under the
same conditions. They also project farther out from the wall as shown in Figure
4.
Form and Function
|
|
| Figure 4. Panel radiators with 1-3 water plates. |
|
When was the last time you looked at a radiator
as the embodiment of artistic expression? Although some older cast-iron
radiators have their share of ruffles and ridges, few match the imagination
shown in some modern panel radiator offerings such as the unit shown in Figure
5.
As with most artistic creations, cost is not the primary consideration leading
to the purchase of such radiators. They aren’t cheap, but they are functional
heat emitters, and can be mixed into a system with other types of panels.
Beyond 20ºF
 |
| Figure 5. Courtesy of Vasco. |
|
Another advantage panel radiators hold over
radiant floor heating is the ability to operate at relatively low flow rates
and higher temperature drops. Many panel radiator systems in Europe are
designed for 20ºC (36ºF) temperature drops at design conditions. This is
approximately double the design temperature drop used in most radiant floor
panel systems.
Radiant floor panels need lower circuit temperature drops to reduce variations
in floor surface temperature to enhance the desired “barefoot friendly” feel.
Some suppliers even suggest limiting design temperature drops in radiant floor
panels to 10ºF. Although this does reduce variations in floor surface
temperature, it also necessitates larger circulators and substantially higher
circulator power consumption.
Designing a panel radiator system for higher temperature drop has several
benefits:
It allows most radiators to be piped with small-diameter
(3/8"-1/2") PEX or PEX-AL-PEX tubing. Such tubing is easy to route
throughout a building, especially in retrofit applications.
The flow rate required by the panel changes in inverse proportion to
the temperature drop (e.g., doubling the temperature drop allows the flow rate
to be cut in half). This allows for significantly smaller circulators, and even
more importantly, greatly reduces the electrical energy used to distribute heat
through the building.
The smaller flow rates and pipe sizes also reduce heat loss from
distribution piping.
Distribution Decisions
 |
| Figure 6. Courtesy of DiaNorm. |
|
Panel radiators can be used with many piping
layouts, including series loops, diverter tee loops, two-pipe parallel direct
return and two-pipe parallel reverse return.
As with other hydronic heat emitters, series or diverter tee layouts require
the size of the radiator be adjusted to compensate for decreasing water
temperature in the downstream direction. Although possible, these approaches do
not offer the two key benefits of a parallel distribution system,
namely:
The ability to deliver water to each radiator at approximately the
same temperature.
Lower head loss, and, thus, lower circulator power relative to the
amount of heat being delivered.
Perhaps the most versatile distribution system for panel radiators is the “home
run” system using PEX or PEX-AL-PEX tubing to and from each panel radiator as
shown in Figure 6. All the supply and return runs come from
a manifold station – just like in a radiant panel system.
Home run distribution systems provide the same water temperature to each panel,
and thus simplify sizing. They also allow each circuit to be balanced for
proper flow. The latter can be done using valves built into the manifold
station, or with integral balancing valves built into certain types of panel
radiators, as shown in Figure 7.
Room-by-room comfort control is easily achieved using a home run distribution
system in combination with panel radiators equipped with non-electric
thermostatic radiator valves. For radiators such as shown in Figure 7, the
thermostatic operator just screws onto the radiator’s flow control valve as
shown in Figure 8. This operator uses the expansion and
contraction of a wax-filled actuator to move the stem of the radiator valve as
needed to maintain the room setpoint temperature.
Putting It All Together
 |
| Figure 7. |
|
Suppose you need a system that provides
room-by-room comfort control, utilizes a high efficiency modulating/condensing
boiler, is simple to install, and economical to operate. Consider the layout
shown in Figure 9.
This design provides room-by-room comfort control using a home-run distribution
system. Each radiator is equipped with a non-electric thermostatic radiator
valve. A pressure-regulated circulator automatically adjusts its speed to
maintain the required differential pressure as the radiator valves modulate
between open and closed.
The high-mass mod/con boiler maintains the proper supply water temperature to
the distribution system based on outdoor reset control. Its high thermal mass
and low head loss eliminate the need for a separate boiler circulator. For the
features offered, it doesn’t get much simpler than this.
Some More Comparisons:
 |
| Figure 8. |
|
Panel radiators are light. Unlike
some suspended slab radiant panels, they have virtually no effect on structural
loading.
Panel radiators don’t affect flooring height.
All radiant floor panel systems must address the thermal resistance
of finish flooring materials. This is an issue when the system is first
designed, and remains an issue throughout the life of that system. The wrong
choices can have devastating effects on heat output and owner satisfaction.
This is obviously not an issue with wall-mounted panel
radiators.
Because they’re not an integral part of the building structure, panel
radiator installation is easier to coordinate with other trades, and less
subject to damage due to negligence on the part of other
trades.
The installed cost of a properly designed panel radiator system will
be hard to match with a properly designed radiant floor heating system. This is
especially true when room-by-room zoning is needed or in retrofit applications.
They’re Not Mutually Exclusive
There are applications where it makes sense to
combine the attributes of radiant floor panels and panel radiators. An example
would be use of radiant floor heating in a basement slab in combination with
panel radiators on the main floor. The schematic in Figure 10
shows how such a system can be piped.
Water temperature control to the panel radiators is handled by the outdoor
reset controller within the mod/con boiler. A manually-set
(non-motorized/non-thermostatic) mixing valve is used to provide proportional
reset control to the lower temperature radiant floor circuits in the basement
slab.
The heat output of each panel radiator is controlled by a non-electric
thermostatic operator mounted to the integral valve on each
radiator.
When domestic water heating is required, the boiler goes to a higher setpoint
temperature and the circulator connecting the boiler to the space heating
system is turned off. This treats domestic water heating as the priority load.
Once the domestic water heating cycle is completed, space heating can
resume.
Summary
Both radiant panels and panel radiators have
their place in the hydronics universe. Both have optimal application scenarios
in which the other simply isn’t an option. For example, using panel radiators
to heat a 10,000-sq.-ft. vehicle maintenance garage doesn’t make
sense.
Likewise, installing radiant floor heating in an existing building with
inaccessible floor structure and expensive surface finishes is virtually out of
the question. Seasoned designers recognize these situations and apply each
technology to maximize performance and benefits to the customer.
|